In Purity and Danger by Mary Douglas, she explains that dirt is a matter of perspective. She says, "There is no such thing as absolute dirt: it exists in the eye of the beholder (2)." In the case of food, there may be cuisine in China that someone from South America might find revolting and vice versa. Personally, I see bugs as inedible, but this is considered food in certain parts of the world. This has a lot to do with where you were raised, the paradigm that you have lived with for most of your life.
I found an interesting quote from Mary Douglas' work that describes this paradigm, which says, "In chaos of shifting impressions, each of us constructs a stable world in which objects have recognizable shapes (45)." Nowadays, if you visit a major U.S. city, you will be able to find a wide diversity of restaurants. These can be anything from modern gastropubs to Indian restaurants with the hottest food in town. So there is this "chaos" of all these choices that determine where one can eat. There are a variety of people who different food preferences, such as those who are very picky eaters and those who are adventurous and love to explore all the food available in the world. Those who categorize themselves as a picky eater would tend to go to restaurants that are closer to their comfort zone, meaning they will tend to go to the restaurant that supplies the foods that they have eaten for most of their lives. I'm curious if this categorization of people as picky eaters has any correlation to the research that David Pizarro presented in his TED Talk on "The Strange Politics of Disgust." Do picky eaters tend to be more easily disgusted and do they tend more towards the conservative end of the political spectrum? Tangent aside, picky eaters construct a category of food that is safe and familiar for them to eat. Anything that is foreign to them falls outside that category and they rule out eating that food. I think it would be safe to say that picky eaters would place the food that I ate in my childhood outside their edible zone.
I found an interesting quote from Mary Douglas' work that describes this paradigm, which says, "In chaos of shifting impressions, each of us constructs a stable world in which objects have recognizable shapes (45)." Nowadays, if you visit a major U.S. city, you will be able to find a wide diversity of restaurants. These can be anything from modern gastropubs to Indian restaurants with the hottest food in town. So there is this "chaos" of all these choices that determine where one can eat. There are a variety of people who different food preferences, such as those who are very picky eaters and those who are adventurous and love to explore all the food available in the world. Those who categorize themselves as a picky eater would tend to go to restaurants that are closer to their comfort zone, meaning they will tend to go to the restaurant that supplies the foods that they have eaten for most of their lives. I'm curious if this categorization of people as picky eaters has any correlation to the research that David Pizarro presented in his TED Talk on "The Strange Politics of Disgust." Do picky eaters tend to be more easily disgusted and do they tend more towards the conservative end of the political spectrum? Tangent aside, picky eaters construct a category of food that is safe and familiar for them to eat. Anything that is foreign to them falls outside that category and they rule out eating that food. I think it would be safe to say that picky eaters would place the food that I ate in my childhood outside their edible zone.